CHENNAI: The Superior Tribunal of Madras (MHC) has published the case presented by Fidecomiso Murasoli, alleging that Fidecomiso has sought to prevent the National Commission for Disadvantaged Castes (NCSC) from passing judgment on the complaint that Fidecomiso had acquired land on Panchami, Wednesday. Have taken possession. (January 10) to direct orders. , Justice S M Subramaniam heard the case of DMK spokesperson Murasoli, which was presented by its administrator R S Bharathi against the stay on proceeding with the hearing by the Comisión National de Castes Desfavoresidas (NCSC) or represented by state secretary R Srinivasan. Heard the question of decision. , Of BJP. Prominent lawyer P Wilson compared FIDECOMISO and vehemently opposed it, saying the NCSC could not decide the ownership of land. The lawyer also argued that this is a complete abuse of power, as it is only the duty of the state to decide the ownership of land property. Additionally, counsel intended to seek an injunction order against NCSC and to impose enhanced costs on the plaintiff. Additional Procurator General (ASG) ARL Sundaresan faced the commission and said the commission established by the Constitution has the authority to investigate and register complaints. Therefore, injunction cannot be issued against NCSC. The government defender said that in 2019, the then Secretary of State Jeff had submitted a report to the NCSC which stated that the land built on top of the Murasoli building was not Panchami land, but Ryotwari Manai. After all deliberations, the judge fixed January 10 for sentencing.
CHENNAI: MHC ready to pronounce verdict in Murasoli Trust Panchami land dispute
